questioning war

If we can't afford money to fight poverty, for schools, for infrastructure, for immigration, and a host of other problems in our own country, how can we afford to spend billions of dollars on an open-ended conflict in an area of the country where we don't have the best track record of "winning" a war, the Middle East?  How could we be so brash to think this will turn out any better than the 3 trillion dollar war-fiasco we just finished in Iraq/Afghanistan?   We can't seem to take care of the veterans who have already sacrificed from the last Middle East war-fiasco.  Veteran disaffection and suicide are at all time highs.  The VA is embroiled in scandal for its inability to address the existing veterans' health needs.   If we really do respect our veterans, how can we expect them to sacrifice further?   Another related issue is that big business is increasingly taking over our war efforts, so privatized for-profit military companies have the most to gain from our decision to go to war again.  Our country is mired in debt.  Conservatives have tried to shut down our government several times because of our crushing debt.  We can't seem to pass any legislation, primarily because republicans say there is no money.   How does war make sense under these circumstances?  Perhaps because there is someone that is benefiting economically.  We can still go to war when there is no money and there are not enough of our own volunteer citizens to support the military by one important move --  by employing a mercenary army where soldiers are working for private, profit-oriented companies, paid by our tax dollars.  So the question then becomes this--  How do we let a mercenary war happen in our name, paid out of our pockets, as good God-fearing human beings?  History shows that one of the best predictors of the fall of an empire is an over-extended military that bankrupts the nation.  Are we so filled with hubris that we are unable to understand these patterns in history?  Any decision to bring us into another Middle East War needs to first address these questions.

This was written in response to MoveOn:

Dear MoveOn member,

In a major address to the nation last night, President Obama announced that the U.S. will escalate its military campaign against ISIS (also known as ISIL or the Islamic State). His plan seeks to "degrade" and ultimately "destroy" ISIS in a sustained air campaign that would include dropping more bombs on Iraq as well as possibly beginning strikes inside Syria.¹

Let's all be really clear: President Obama is, in essence, proposing that we launch a new U.S. war in the Middle East. The White House has indicated that this strategy could take upward of three years to execute—meaning Obama would be handing the next president a new war after he brought Bush's Iraq war to a close.² Roughly 1,600 U.S. troops and advisers have already been deployed to the region in recent weeks.³ Senior members of Congress are currently drafting legislation to authorize arming Syrian rebels.⁴

It was especially sobering to wake up to this news on September 11—an anniversary of so much pain and tragedy.

It's vital that we slow down and engage in a real, full-throated debate—including discussion of all the alternatives we have for confronting ISIS—rather than rushing headlong into another open-ended war in the Middle East.

There are tough questions we should be grappling with to avoid making the same mistakes again—questions like:

How is the U.S. prioritizing alternatives to military force, such as halting the flow of weapons to the region that end up in ISIS's hands and cutting off ISIS's financing so it can't keep waging war?

How might the use of U.S. military force undermine those alternative strategies?

What's the U.S.'s exit strategy? What does "defeating" ISIS look like? How will we know when to stop?

What are the potential unintended consequences? 

We haven't heard these questions asked or answered by the president or Congress, and yet they must be deliberated. Using facts. In the open. With opportunities for all Americans to weigh in.

We know the costs are simply too high to get this wrong. We know it's up to us to ask these questions, and we know it's up to us to demand sound answers.

Will you submit a question you want answered by Congress, the president, and our military leaders before we launch into another open-ended war in the Middle East?

We'll begin by sharing MoveOn members' questions with Congress, the president, and the media.

But we won't stop there, because few if any decisions a country makes are as consequential as the decision to go to war. Again, we need a full, open, fact-based national discussion. If September 11 and the tragic decade that followed should've taught us anything—it's that we as a public must demand answers to hard questions before launching into war.

Thanks for all you do.

–Anna, Brian, Jo, Maria, and the rest of the team

P.S. In case you missed it, here's a link to the transcript of President Obama's remarks. 

Sources:

1. "Statement by the President on ISL," The White House, September 10, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300724&id=101206-20053560-BiCQeWx&t=5

2. "Destroying ISIS May Take Years, U.S. Officials Say," The New York Times, September 7, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300723&id=101206-20053560-BiCQeWx&t=6

3. "We Already Have Boots on the Ground in Iraq," The Huffington Post, September 11, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300745&id=101206-20053560-BiCQeWx&t=7

4. "Obama Urgently Wants Congress to Vote on Arming Syrian Rebels," The Wire, September 10, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300746&id=101206-20053560-BiCQeWx&t=9

Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.